Tzipi Obziler vs Loredana Bujor Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W L L
Form
L W L L L L L L L LH2H: Obziler 1 - 0 Bujor
They have played 2 sets in total, with Obziler winning 2 and Bujor winning 0. The last match between Obziler and Bujor was at the ITF Jaffa, 24-02-1992, Fourth, Hard with Tzipi Obziler getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tzipi Obziler | 1 |
| Loredana Bujor | 0 |
ITF Jaffa(24-02-1992)
6
0
6
2
| Obziler | Stats | Bujor |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 75 | Highest Rank | 455 |
| 52 | Age | 52 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (272-208) | Career Total W/L | 43% (23-30) |
| $129,950 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Svitolina VS Sakkari PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tzipi Obziler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Lenka Tvaroskova
Player
Tzipi Obziler
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Silvia Soler-Espinosa
Player
Tzipi Obziler
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Mayr-Achleitner
Player
Tzipi Obziler
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
40%
(
12 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tzipi Obziler
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
15
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Loredana Bujor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 3-0 RET | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R3 | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (272/208) | Win/Loss | 43% (23/30) |
| 56% (618/485) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (54/68) |
| 53% (5293/4695) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (512/548) |
| 62% (173/107) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 50% (63/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (17/21) |
| 51% (31/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 36% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 135 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 128 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 511.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 522.53 |
| 64% (3215/4995) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (1935/3215) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (793/1779) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (246/542) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (2138/4926) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (28/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (9/11) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (6/10) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 57% (72/54) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (145/96) | Challenger W/L | 42% (22/30) |
| 80% (4/1) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (269/476) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (45/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 49% (69/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 86% (268/230) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (25/18) |
| 14% (268/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (25/7) |
| 20% (212/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (28/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
